Online dating networks dating show elimidate

There is also a considerable amount of information asymmetry on both sides of the market, as users have an incentive to present a biased view of themselves on their online profiles.Furthermore, design decisions may actually encourage information asymmetry, such as in the case of Tinder, on which matches are judged based on a few pictures and minimal profile information.This makes matching in the market quite interesting as individual preferences are likely to be heterogenous.

online dating networks-74

This helps balance the split of the market, keeping both sides interested.Thus, the efficiency of the network depends not just on number of users, but also on their potential to be a match for others, and a good strategy for the platform might be to limit users to those likely to find matches.Because of the importance of network effects to the efficiency of the market, it is common to see design choices made to exploit this factor.The search vs recommend design decision also determines knowledge other users have of preferences – while the search design allows users to directly observe each others’ preferences, the recommendation design forces users to only infer preferences.We can argue that recommendation algorithms are more efficient, as they would only show users to each other if they believed that both users could find each attractive, and thus they would reduce search costs.

Leave a Reply